Re: [LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Linux Audio User <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - 8:29 pm

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:16:49PM +0200, Roberto wrote:

I thought about that too, but then I started calculating:

4,294,967,296 (unsigned int of 32 bits) / 48000 (seconds)
/ 360 (hours) / 24 (days) = 1.035630617

So if it would be sample count, (jack_nframes_t),
it would overflow after approximately one day, I guess.

greetings,

lieven
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd, Eric Steinberg, (Mon May 23, 10:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd, Paul Davis, (Mon May 23, 11:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd, Eric Steinberg, (Wed Jul 13, 7:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd, Eric Steinberg, (Mon May 23, 11:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue May 24, 2:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd, Lieven Moors, (Wed May 25, 8:29 pm)