Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, April 3, 2011 - 7:54 pm

Am 03.04.2011 18:46, schrieb Patrick Shirkey:

No, it would not.
The greatest challenge whe building an atom-bomb is not to get enough
clean fissable material, It s the the question: "How fast can you raise
the mass from non-critical to critical?" Any mass of plutonium that
gathers to a critical mass with the speed that is feasible by mere
gravitation will simply go off in a *slow* burst of radiation.

That would be catastrophic for the area around the place where this
happens but it will happen without a explosion.

> Given how bad it is already I would not be

I think it is absolutely unacceptable, that TEPCO did not start to build
a sarcophagus the first day after the tsunami.

> Although I have it on good authority that it is more likely to just

This could be a simple hydrogen-explosion as had happened 2 days after
the tsunami. Catastrophic for the area yet not for the whole northern
hemisphere.

> Even if it only

So say we all...

> I shudder to think of

There is nothing to ignite -- concrete does not burn and the fuel in the
facility is burning already.

>

The poisoning is the cancer. But: Plutonium has a very high
melting-point and it is the heaviest material known to be stable, it is
not good in spreading.

> Just

There is nothing even close to the clouds from the Tchernobyl-desaster
as of now. And there are people living today even in Kiev. Berlin is as
near to Tchernobyl as Kyushu is to Fukushima and we are still alive too...

> Remember that just cos

Dont get me wrong: the Fukushima case is indeed a catastrophe, that will
have its impact upon the whole earth. But it is not a EOTW-event. It is
one more good reason not to eat sea-fish though. But first and foremost
it is another evidence for the fact, that buisinessmen have too much
power in this world.

>

That is absolutely true. And to say, that this is the End of the world
does not help them in any way to get along with that desaster.

> It's absolutely categorically

So you see yourself that there is no logic in such a "clandestine
weapons program" and still believe, there is one?

>

exactly

best regards.

>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Ken Restivo, (Fri Apr 1, 6:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Apr 2, 3:40 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Apr 2, 3:27 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Hartmut Noack, (Sat Apr 2, 10:46 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Apr 3, 8:56 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Arnold Krille, (Sun Apr 3, 3:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Apr 3, 4:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Hartmut Noack, (Sun Apr 3, 7:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Apr 4, 1:44 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Mon Apr 4, 2:42 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Apr 4, 5:41 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Mon Apr 4, 6:14 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Apr 4, 3:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Mon Apr 4, 3:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Apr 4, 6:43 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Mon Apr 4, 11:04 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Apr 4, 2:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Mon Apr 4, 3:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Apr 4, 3:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Cedric Roux, (Mon Apr 4, 3:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Florian Faber, (Mon Apr 4, 4:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Apr 4, 11:45 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Apr 4, 7:27 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Robin Gareus, (Sun Apr 3, 5:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Hartmut Noack, (Sun Apr 3, 7:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Robin Gareus, (Sun Apr 3, 7:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Apr 3, 8:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Folderol, (Sun Apr 3, 9:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Hartmut Noack, (Sun Apr 3, 8:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Robin Gareus, (Sun Apr 3, 8:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, david, (Sat Apr 2, 8:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Folderol, (Sat Apr 2, 9:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, david, (Sun Apr 3, 12:00 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: metal, money, changes, bleg, Andrew C, (Sun Apr 3, 12:59 am)