Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"...

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Alexandre Prokoudine <alexandre.prokoudine@...>
Cc: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, March 5, 2011 - 6:54 pm

--90e6ba3fd29993787e049dc0cacf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoudine@gmail.com> wrote:

Oh come on, you should know me at least well enough to know I don't believe
that and certainly didn't say it:)

> I heartily disagree. Tweaking OS to get things done comes *before* you

The problem is that most of the time it is.

> That makes

In that case you are writing a manual for Ardour, so wanna join the work
already in progress that you just wrote about?;)

Of course the appendixes would require constant maintenence and would be
exceedinly numerous as there are numerous distributions used in pro audio on
Linux. That, I think but am not certain, is why the FLOSS manual covered
Ubuntu to a limited degree and left it there. Trying to cover all of them
is quite challenging and requires much more time than they had.

Of course that being said just triyng to cover all of what Ardour can do is
challenging in itself, trust me:)

Seablade

--90e6ba3fd29993787e049dc0cacf
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Alexandr=
e Prokoudine <alexandre.prokoudine@gmail.com> wrote:=A0
So what you are saying is that we will never be able to do it :)

Oh come on, you should know me at least we=
ll enough to know I don't believe that and certainly didn't say it:=
)=A0
I heartily disagree. Tweaking OS to get things done comes *before* you
start meddling with Ardour and isn't required all the time.The problem is that most of the time it is.=
=A0
That makes
it possible to just write an Appendix that will cover several
distributions, while bloody well focusing on Ardour. So what's the
problem?

In that case you are writing a=
manual for Ardour, so wanna join the work already in progress that you jus=
t wrote about?;)Of course the appendixes wo=
uld require constant maintenence and would be exceedinly numerous as there =
are numerous distributions used in pro audio on Linux. =A0That, I think but=
am not certain, is why the FLOSS manual covered Ubuntu to a limited degree=
and left it there. =A0Trying to cover all of them is quite challenging and=
requires much more time than they had.
Of course that being said just triyng to cover al=
l of what Ardour can do is challenging in itself, trust me:)=
=A0 =A0Seablade

--90e6ba3fd29993787e049dc0cacf--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Kim Cascone, (Fri Mar 4, 4:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Andrew C, (Fri Mar 4, 5:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Mar 4, 5:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Fri Mar 4, 6:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Mar 4, 6:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Fri Mar 4, 7:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Mar 4, 7:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., david, (Sat Mar 5, 6:06 am)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Sat Mar 5, 2:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Mar 5, 5:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Joe Hartley, (Sat Mar 5, 6:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Mar 5, 7:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Sat Mar 5, 6:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Sat Mar 5, 5:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Sat Mar 5, 5:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Mar 5, 6:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Sat Mar 5, 6:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Mar 5, 7:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Mar 5, 6:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Sat Mar 5, 6:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Mar 5, 7:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., rosea.grammostola, (Sat Mar 5, 3:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Robin Gareus, (Sat Mar 5, 2:00 am)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Kim Cascone, (Fri Mar 4, 7:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Kim Cascone, (Fri Mar 4, 6:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Fri Mar 4, 6:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Mar 4, 6:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Fri Mar 4, 7:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Mar 4, 7:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Kim Cascone, (Fri Mar 4, 6:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Fri Mar 4, 7:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Robin Gareus, (Sat Mar 5, 1:58 am)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Robin Gareus, (Sat Mar 5, 2:14 am)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Kim Cascone, (Fri Mar 4, 8:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., david, (Sat Mar 5, 6:13 am)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., david, (Fri Mar 4, 7:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Kim Cascone, (Fri Mar 4, 6:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Fri Mar 4, 9:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Kim Cascone, (Fri Mar 4, 6:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., S C Rigler, (Fri Mar 4, 4:46 pm)