Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"...

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Renato <rennabh@...>
Cc: Linux Audio Users <linux-audio-user@...>, Kim Cascone <kim@...>
Date: Friday, March 4, 2011 - 8:50 pm

On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 15:41:03 +0100
Renato wrote:

>

I won't reply in detail to the last messages, sorry, it really got too
convoluted for me, and it seems we've got to a point where we can only
restate what we allready stated. And, after all, I could be making
muffins instead of writing here

cheers
renato
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Kim Cascone, (Thu Mar 3, 7:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Hartmut Noack, (Fri Mar 4, 3:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Mar 4, 2:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Fri Mar 4, 2:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Fri Mar 4, 8:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Fri Mar 4, 3:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Fri Mar 4, 5:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Fri Mar 4, 9:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., david, (Thu Mar 3, 8:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Fri Mar 4, 3:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., david, (Fri Mar 4, 7:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Mar 4, 7:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., drew Roberts, (Fri Mar 4, 3:42 pm)