Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"...

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Renato <rennabh@...>
Cc: Kim Cascone <kim@...>, <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, March 4, 2011 - 6:31 pm

--90e6ba6138a2e61bc3049dac58a6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Renato wrote:

>

Actually I would disagree. Yes whether a tool can be sued for professional
projects is one thing, but the difference is in speed. These days a
professional level tool is one that allows you to accomplish your task as
quickly as possible with as few distractions as possible. This is generally
also inferred to be user friendliness, but not necessarily, it does however
mean that you shouldn't need to spend time doing extra things that could be
done for you, like configure your OS just so you can work;)

Seablade

Who has used and continues to use Linux for professional projects.

--90e6ba6138a2e61bc3049dac58a6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Renato <=
span dir=3D"ltr"><rennabh@gmail.com=
> wrote:

but pro level has nothing to do with user friendliness. I mean of
course we want the linux audio environment to improve, but that has
nothing to do with a pretty DE where you don't need to use the terminal=

or tweak one or two .conf files
Actually I would disagree. =A0Yes wh=
ether a tool can be sued for professional projects is one thing, but the di=
fference is in speed. =A0These days a professional level tool is one that a=
llows you to accomplish your task as quickly as possible with as few distra=
ctions as possible. =A0This is generally also inferred to be user friendlin=
ess, but not necessarily, it does however mean that you shouldn't need =
to spend time doing extra things that could be done for you, like configure=
your OS just so you can work;)
=A0 =A0 =A0 SeabladeWho has u=
sed and continues to use Linux for professional projects.

--90e6ba6138a2e61bc3049dac58a6--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Kim Cascone, (Fri Mar 4, 4:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Andrew C, (Fri Mar 4, 5:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Mar 4, 5:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Fri Mar 4, 6:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Mar 4, 6:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Fri Mar 4, 7:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Mar 4, 7:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., david, (Sat Mar 5, 6:06 am)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Sat Mar 5, 2:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Mar 5, 5:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Joe Hartley, (Sat Mar 5, 6:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Mar 5, 7:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Sat Mar 5, 6:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Sat Mar 5, 5:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Sat Mar 5, 5:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Mar 5, 6:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Sat Mar 5, 6:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Mar 5, 7:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Mar 5, 6:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Sat Mar 5, 6:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Mar 5, 7:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., rosea.grammostola, (Sat Mar 5, 3:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Robin Gareus, (Sat Mar 5, 2:00 am)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Kim Cascone, (Fri Mar 4, 7:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Kim Cascone, (Fri Mar 4, 6:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Fri Mar 4, 6:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Mar 4, 6:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Fri Mar 4, 7:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Mar 4, 7:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Kim Cascone, (Fri Mar 4, 6:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Fri Mar 4, 7:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Robin Gareus, (Sat Mar 5, 1:58 am)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Robin Gareus, (Sat Mar 5, 2:14 am)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Kim Cascone, (Fri Mar 4, 8:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., david, (Sat Mar 5, 6:13 am)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., david, (Fri Mar 4, 7:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Kim Cascone, (Fri Mar 4, 6:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Fri Mar 4, 9:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Kim Cascone, (Fri Mar 4, 6:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., S C Rigler, (Fri Mar 4, 4:46 pm)