Re: [LAU] Audigy too

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, March 19, 2011 - 6:59 pm

Hi Batz,

Hope that Fedora works out for you - as others have already said, it's
possible to get linux audio working on any distro, but it is more/less
work depending on how well your components are supported.

> Yes that's pretty much exactly what I'm saying. And what I've been trying to

Regarding Linux Sampler - I have never had any issues with it at all
(Debian and Ubuntu). I just followed the instructions on the LS site
and compiled/installed from source. There are several libraries that
need to be compiled/installed before it will work, but it is well
documented on the site. You probably do need to get jack working first
though.. I would recommend qsampler as the GUI frontend to LS.

Regarding creating/editing samples/banks - I'm not sure what you are
after. My workflow (if I wanted to get sample-based instruments into
fluidsynth) would probably be:

1) run jack (using qjackclt)
2) Linux-based synths: zynaddsubfx/bristol/AMS/phasex/... others? with
audio output routed (via jack) to:
3) time-machine (note - if you wanted to make "wet" samples, you could
route the audio output from the synth through something like jack-rack
to run some ladspa effects before routing on to time machine).

4) load audio snippets recorded using time machine into:
5) Audacity - edit samples, normalise, maybe add effects?
6) Make soundfonts using Swami (or if using linuxsampler as playback
engine maybe make gig files using gigedit, or maybe sfx files with
hand-editing a text file).

James
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Batz, (Sun Mar 13, 6:21 am)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Peter Nelson, (Sun Mar 13, 8:06 am)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Leigh Dyer, (Sun Mar 13, 7:23 am)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Batz, (Mon Mar 14, 9:43 am)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Leigh Dyer, (Tue Mar 15, 11:14 am)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Michelle Konzack, (Sat Mar 19, 8:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, david, (Sat Mar 19, 10:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Batz, (Wed Mar 16, 10:49 am)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Cedric Roux, (Thu Mar 17, 8:31 am)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Stephen Stubbs, (Wed Mar 16, 1:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, michael noble, (Wed Mar 16, 11:47 am)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Renato, (Wed Mar 16, 11:30 am)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, david, (Thu Mar 17, 9:17 am)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Leigh Dyer, (Wed Mar 16, 12:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Dave Phillips, (Wed Mar 16, 1:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, david, (Thu Mar 17, 9:37 am)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Batz, (Thu Mar 17, 1:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, S. Massy, (Fri Mar 18, 11:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Batz, (Sat Mar 19, 2:11 am)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, James Stone, (Sat Mar 19, 6:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Paul Davis, (Sun Mar 13, 12:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Audigy too, Stephen Stubbs, (Sun Mar 13, 2:43 pm)