Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"...

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2011 - 9:12 pm

On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 15:02 -0600, S C Rigler wrote:

We could rekindle the SARS codes, but instead of AAD, DAD, DDD, we
could have LLW, LML, LLL, (Linux, Mac, Windows)

..or not.

I do miss those codes. I used to make buying decisions based on them.

Bearcat

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Mark Knecht, (Mon Feb 28, 6:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Wed Mar 2, 2:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jeremy Jongepier, (Wed Mar 2, 3:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Ray Rashif, (Wed Mar 2, 3:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Burkhard Wölfel, (Tue Mar 1, 10:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue Mar 1, 8:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Bearcat M. , (Tue Mar 1, 8:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue Mar 1, 9:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., S C Rigler, (Tue Mar 1, 9:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue Mar 1, 9:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., S C Rigler, (Tue Mar 1, 9:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Folderol, (Tue Mar 1, 11:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Tue Mar 1, 11:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Bearcat M. , (Tue Mar 1, 11:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Ricardus Vincente, (Tue Mar 1, 11:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Bearcat M. , (Tue Mar 1, 9:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Mar 1, 8:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Bearcat M. , (Tue Mar 1, 8:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Wed Mar 2, 9:58 am)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Mark Knecht, (Wed Mar 2, 2:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Mar 3, 12:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Mark Knecht, (Thu Mar 3, 12:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Mar 4, 1:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Thu Mar 3, 12:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Paul Davis, (Tue Mar 1, 9:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Luke Peterson, (Tue Mar 1, 8:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Nick Copeland, (Mon Feb 28, 7:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Mar 12, 7:38 am)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Mar 9, 7:08 am)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., David Baron, (Mon Feb 28, 8:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Paul Davis, (Mon Feb 28, 8:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Ronald Stewart, (Mon Feb 28, 8:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Nick Copeland, (Mon Feb 28, 6:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Ricardus Vincente, (Mon Feb 28, 6:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Joe Hartley, (Mon Feb 28, 7:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., James Stone, (Mon Feb 28, 7:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Ricardus Vincente, (Mon Feb 28, 7:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., James Stone, (Mon Feb 28, 7:35 pm)