Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"...

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2011 - 8:44 pm

On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 21:01 +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:

I thought Avid *was* Protools and that they had no interest at all in
Linux. Not that they are hostile (leave that to MOTU), but just no
interest, being aimed at Apple branded stuff.

Bearcat

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Mark Knecht, (Mon Feb 28, 6:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Wed Mar 2, 2:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jeremy Jongepier, (Wed Mar 2, 3:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Ray Rashif, (Wed Mar 2, 3:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Burkhard Wölfel, (Tue Mar 1, 10:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue Mar 1, 8:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Bearcat M. , (Tue Mar 1, 8:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue Mar 1, 9:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., S C Rigler, (Tue Mar 1, 9:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue Mar 1, 9:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., S C Rigler, (Tue Mar 1, 9:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Folderol, (Tue Mar 1, 11:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Tue Mar 1, 11:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Bearcat M. , (Tue Mar 1, 11:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Ricardus Vincente, (Tue Mar 1, 11:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Bearcat M. , (Tue Mar 1, 9:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Mar 1, 8:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Bearcat M. , (Tue Mar 1, 8:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Wed Mar 2, 9:58 am)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Mark Knecht, (Wed Mar 2, 2:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Mar 3, 12:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Mark Knecht, (Thu Mar 3, 12:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Mar 4, 1:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Thu Mar 3, 12:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Paul Davis, (Tue Mar 1, 9:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Luke Peterson, (Tue Mar 1, 8:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Nick Copeland, (Mon Feb 28, 7:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Mar 12, 7:38 am)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Mar 9, 7:08 am)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., David Baron, (Mon Feb 28, 8:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Paul Davis, (Mon Feb 28, 8:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Ronald Stewart, (Mon Feb 28, 8:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Nick Copeland, (Mon Feb 28, 6:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Ricardus Vincente, (Mon Feb 28, 6:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Joe Hartley, (Mon Feb 28, 7:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., James Stone, (Mon Feb 28, 7:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Ricardus Vincente, (Mon Feb 28, 7:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., James Stone, (Mon Feb 28, 7:35 pm)