> There is not mistake. Each way has advantages and disadvantages. As for me - when i work with pro audio software, i don't like to lost jack-less applications, like web browser.
I think you missed my point. I didn't say that you should lose audio
from such applications. I said that introducing a layer of the
complexity of PulseAudio in order to do this, when there are other
options available seems like a mistake to me. I cited my specific case
where I listen to a variety of non-JACK-aware audio applications all
day, via JACK, but without using PulseAudio because I don't need any
of the (fairly cool) PulseAudio features or its complications.
Linux-audio-user mailing list Linuxemail@example.com http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user