Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
> I'm looking for a Linux solution to watermarking audio
Are you looking at an open operating system to help you close your=20
mind? Forget the technical issues involved=2C I personally think you are=20
talking to the wrong community: watermarking is a means of restricting=20
distribution of visual material.=20
Linux is not about restricting distribution of anything.
Perhaps you should raise these questions on one of the Apple mailing=20
lists where you will meet equally paranoid minds. Bringing these issues
up on this list is out of line.
"we have to make sure the old choice [Windows] doesn't disappear=94.
Jim Wong=2C president of IT products=2C Acer
> Date: Sun=2C 23 Oct 2011 17:38:29 +0000
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252"
>=3B I'm looking for a Linux solution to watermarking audioAre y=
ou looking at an open operating system to help you close your mind? For=
get the technical issues involved=2C I personally think you are talking=
to the wrong community: watermarking is a means of restricting distrib=
ution of visual material. Linux is not about restricting distributi=
on of anything.Perhaps you should raise these questions on one of t=
he Apple mailing lists where you will meet equally paranoid minds. Brin=
ging these issuesup on this list is out of line.Regards=2C nick=
"we have to make sure the old choice [Windows] doesn't disappear=94=
.Jim Wong=2C president of IT products=2C Acer>=3B Da=
te: Sun=2C 23 Oct 2011 17:38:29 +0000>=3B From: firstname.lastname@example.org>=3B To: email@example.com>=3B Subject: Re: [=
LAU] Looking for Audio Watermarking Advice &=3B Tools>=3B >=
=3B On Sun=2C Oct 23=2C 2011 at 08:13:24AM -0700=2C Kevin Cosgrove wrote:>=3B >=3B >=3B The subject line says it all. I'm looking for =
a Linux solution to >=3B >=3B watermarking audio. Thanks...>=
=3B >=3B I've never seen any. The amount of work to develop such a th=
ing>=3B would depend on your exact requirements. Important parameters=
>=3B are:>=3B >=3B * Which operations should leave the wa=
termark intact. If this>=3B includes lossy encoding/decoding things=
get more difficult.>=3B >=3B * The minium duration of a fragme=
nt that allows the mark to be>=3B detected.>=3B >=3B * =
How strong the 'provability' should be.>=3B >=3B * Operational =
requirements. For example=2C should it be possible>=3B to verify th=
e mark without having the information necessary>=3B to remove it ?<=
br>>=3B >=3B >=3B Ciao=2C>=3B >=3B -- >=3B =
FA>=3B >=3B _______________________________________________>=3B Linux-audio-user mailing list>=3B Linuxfirstname.lastname@example.org=