Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: <fons@...>

To: <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording

Date: Sunday, January 30, 2011 - 8:41 pm

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 09:27:46PM +0100, Hartmut Noack wrote:

> Do you think, the same problem would arise with the MD-Recorder?

quoted text

> ATRAC is based on the same principles as MP3 so it may have the
> same shortcomings when it comes to record material for
> HIFI-impulses.

Yes. Just imagine a reverb of 2 seconds (RT60), and a 10 seconds
long logarithmic sweep, that's about 1 second per octave. So
when the sweep is at 2 kHz, the room response for 1k kHz is
already 30 dB down. Any perceptual coding is going to remove
that, or make nonsense of it.

Ciao,

--
FA

There are three of them, and Alleline.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Michal Seta, (Fri Jan 28, 6:40 am)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Ken Restivo, (Sun Jan 30, 3:07 am)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Arnold Krille, (Fri Jan 28, 2:09 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, , (Fri Jan 28, 3:18 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, , (Fri Jan 28, 12:23 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Hartmut Noack, (Sun Jan 30, 10:34 am)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Arnold Krille, (Sun Jan 30, 12:22 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Hartmut Noack, (Sun Jan 30, 5:55 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, , (Sun Jan 30, 7:29 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Hartmut Noack, (Sun Jan 30, 8:27 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, , (Sun Jan 30, 8:41 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Hartmut Noack, (Sun Jan 30, 12:11 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Renato, (Fri Jan 28, 2:37 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, , (Fri Jan 28, 3:44 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Ken Restivo, (Mon Jan 31, 3:53 am)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, , (Mon Jan 31, 11:01 am)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Kevin Cosgrove, (Sun Jan 30, 9:39 am)

[LAU] Aliki update (was: OT - impulse response recording), , (Sun Jan 30, 2:21 pm)

Re: [LAU] Aliki update (was: OT - impulse response recording), Kevin Cosgrove, (Sun Jan 30, 8:00 pm)

Re: [LAU] Aliki update (was: OT - impulse response recording), , (Sun Jan 30, 8:34 pm)

Re: [LAU] Aliki update (was: OT - impulse response recording), Kevin Cosgrove, (Sun Jan 30, 10:16 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Jan 30, 10:43 am)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Kevin Cosgrove, (Sun Jan 30, 7:59 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Renato, (Fri Jan 28, 4:04 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Renato, (Fri Jan 28, 5:07 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Fabio, (Fri Jan 28, 12:56 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Fabio, (Fri Jan 28, 5:16 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, , (Fri Jan 28, 5:28 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Fabio, (Fri Jan 28, 6:58 pm)

Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Julien Claassen, (Fri Jan 28, 10:00 am)