Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: <fons@...>
To: Renato <rennabh@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, January 28, 2011 - 3:44 pm

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 03:37:21PM +0100, Renato wrote:

> fons@kokkinizita.net wrote:

They have to be of reasonable quality and FR, but any remaining
small errors can easily be calibrated out. You just take the
direct sound (for a good speaker + mic this will be the first few
ms of the IR) as a reference.

A few percent distortion (most speakers will have this) does not
matter if the measurement is done in the correct way: after the
deconvolution the distortion products will appear *before* the
real IR and they can be removed easily.

> Also, do mic vendors offer files with the frequency response of the mic

The high quality ones will have tight specs and usually come with
a measured FR or other calibration data.

There are a few other points to consider.

Most speakers will be directional at all but the lowest frequencies.
It depends on your application if this matters or not. If it does
(e.g. to measure room acoustics according to international standards)
you need an omnidirectional speaker. These are usually made as a
dodecahedron of small speakers. See
for an example.

Also omni mics will have some directionality at high frequencies, and
that is why they come in two forms: calibrated for flat FR on-axis
(plane wave), or for flat FR in a diffuse field (averaged over all
directions). The difference matters only at very high frequencies.
Some measurement come with a small conical diffuser which can be
attached in front to improve diffuse-field response.

Ciao,

--
FA

There are three of them, and Alleline.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Michal Seta, (Fri Jan 28, 6:40 am)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Ken Restivo, (Sun Jan 30, 3:07 am)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Arnold Krille, (Fri Jan 28, 2:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Hartmut Noack, (Sun Jan 30, 10:34 am)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Arnold Krille, (Sun Jan 30, 12:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Hartmut Noack, (Sun Jan 30, 5:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Hartmut Noack, (Sun Jan 30, 8:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Hartmut Noack, (Sun Jan 30, 12:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Renato, (Fri Jan 28, 2:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, , (Fri Jan 28, 3:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Ken Restivo, (Mon Jan 31, 3:53 am)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Kevin Cosgrove, (Sun Jan 30, 9:39 am)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Jan 30, 10:43 am)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Kevin Cosgrove, (Sun Jan 30, 7:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Renato, (Fri Jan 28, 4:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Renato, (Fri Jan 28, 5:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Fabio, (Fri Jan 28, 12:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Fabio, (Fri Jan 28, 5:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Fabio, (Fri Jan 28, 6:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording, Julien Claassen, (Fri Jan 28, 10:00 am)