linuxaudio.org

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Christopher Cherrett

 wrote:

quoted text
> I suspect there is much more to this puzzle than attribution. I suspect we

> rocked the boat just a bit too much and too fast.

>

No, there really isn't.(At least not in as far as the original post

that started this was concerned)
Not sure why you keep insisting there is, but there isn't.  It was a

simple request, easily answered, and was turned into something much

more than it really should have been.
You also seem to think that the Ardour project is disgruntled with

you.  Not really.  In fact many of us were discussing this project

yesterday and today both on IRC, and aside from the attribution issue,

it was well received in general and more than a fair amount of well

wishing.  There are things that confuse us, such as why fork an

existing project when you were asked to put something in Mantis,

instead of writing a patch for the single feature or expanding it, but

that is your choice, and is part of the freedom of open source

obviously and I think everyone gets that.  The primary detractor from

it was simply the attribution issue and clarifying that.
At any rate, I think that has been expressed, wish you well on your

project and I may play around with it myself before long as well.

Thanks for the contribution to the community.
      Seablade

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user