Re: [LAU] jamin (was: Albums under a label recorded and/or mixed with Linux)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, September 30, 2010 - 3:40 pm

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:11:32AM +0200, fons@kokkinizita.net wrote:

> > Do I understand your hint correctly when I guess that if you invert the

wouldnt a linkwitz-riley fit best here ?

i am still a bit confused.
i always thought, that a mastering processor should be linear phase.
so what came to my mind first, when i saw the comments about the
problems in the lower bands, was to just increase the number of FIR
taps. we would lower cpu usage also.

we would get a considerably higher latency though.

fons... do you think a 16384 tap fir could do a decent crossover and EQ
?

(assuming this linear phase mumbo jumbo actually makes sense)

this is intended for post-proc, so latency is not relevant.

>

--
torben Hohn
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] jamin (was: Albums under a label recorded and/or m..., Philipp Überbacher, (Thu Sep 30, 5:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] jamin, fred, (Thu Sep 30, 6:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] jamin (was: Albums under a label recorded and/or m..., Philipp Überbacher, (Wed Sep 29, 9:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] jamin (was: Albums under a label recorded and/or m..., Philipp Überbacher, (Sun Oct 3, 10:32 am)
Re: [LAU] jamin (was: Albums under a label recorded and/or m..., torbenh, (Thu Sep 30, 3:40 pm)