On Tuesday 28 September 2010 16:21:48 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
I don't actually remember Ken saying that he runs jamin on his eeepc. True,=
is running an awful lot of software on there, but I doubt that he is adding=
10ms artificial delay from jamin to his live-setup...
> If you want to have it running during production then you should probably
Yes, a 1.8GHz turion64 running jack (3x1028@48kHz) and an ardour session wi=
two stereo tracks, 4 plugins (SC4-compressor and an eq for each stereo) is =
weak to also run jamin.
Please get a grip! I am not using jamin on an under-spec machine. And I am =
mis-using it during mixing/recording of a >48-channels session either. I ev=
stopped dreaming about using jamin for live-foh usage (because of the delay=
introduced by the filter).
All I am saying is that jamin takes up a good amount of resources for its=20
And I combined Fons' argument that the filter used is not a good implementa=
and probably not needed anyway with my idea of a simpler but equally useful=
[*] It would be uber-cool if one could switch off that analyzer-view to sav=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----