> Bristol looks grand, everything is layed out before you on a single screen
> (for nearly all the synths) and it functions fine. Zynaddsubfx on the other
> hand.... Quite complex, but very flexible.
> But comparing the looks of a synth to a sequencer? lol wut?!
>
> Andrew
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Louigi Verona
> wrote:
>
>> Dear fons, perhaps. It is, after all, a matter of taste. I like Qtractor
>> GUI a lot,
>> it is inspiring. But I like Wired too, to be honest.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:01 PM, wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:25:32AM +0100, James Stone wrote:
>>>
>>> > I think you hit the nail on the head - the graphics are really nice on
>>> > wired - unlike most of the other linux apps (with possible exception
>>> > of bristol, renoise etc.)
>>>
>>> /me looks. ? ?? ??? IMHO it looks 'cheap plastic', and surely
>>> not as any piece of HW I'd trust. Lots of ugly and completely
>>> disfunctionalo eye candy.
>>>
>>> Qtractor looks at least 30 dB better to me, as does Renoise.
>>>
>>> Ciao,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Je veux que la mort me trouve plantant mes choux, mais
>>> nonchalant d’elle, et encore plus de mon jardin imparfait.
>>> (Michel de Montaigne)
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-audio-user mailing list
>>>
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
>>>
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Louigi Verona
>>
http://www.louigiverona.ru/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-audio-user mailing list
>>
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
>>
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>>
>>
>