linuxaudio.org

Surprisingly enough, I am using a period of 64.  Apparently kernel

development is going strong :-)
J.E.B.
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 22:04 +0200, fons@kokkinizita.net wrote:

quoted text
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:28:25PM -0500, Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:

>

> > I was very surprised to see Jack2 working well set to realtime +

> > soft mode, with a normal (non-rt) kernel, giving me 2.67 ms stated

> > latency without kernel crashes in Fedora 13.  Anyone doing it this

> > way?  Anyone see disadvantages?  So far it's pretty gravy for me.

>

> I've been using unpatched (for RT) kernels (2.6.32 and 2.6.33) for

> some time on a number of audio systems, and they all work very well

> with period sizes of 256 and 128 (didn't test any lower ones).

> Seems like unpatched kernels are performing quite well these days.

> The only problem I've had was with the 'nouveau' video module for

> Nvidia cards - on two systems it made even a period size of 1024

> unusable (and I had to replace it with the older nv) while on the

> others there were no problems at all.

>

> Ciao,

> 

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user