linuxaudio.org

When it comes to making money from our art, just because we as artists

can create something doesn't mean people have any obligation to listen

to it (regardless of if anyone pays us for it).
If you don't produce what people want to listen to, they won't steal

your music or pay for it. They won't listen to it.
I think a lot of musicians make little or no money in music because

they've chosen to pursue music that pleases only them or their chosen

"in" / "cool" crowd. (I blame it all on the Romantic movement and its

idea that creative people are somehow specially touched by the gods,

therefore worthy of greater honor than other people.)
When I was playing professionally many decades ago, there was a local

band in my home town that was making about $200K a year without selling

a single record. What they sold was their live performance, which was

entertaining and people wanted to listen to.
A bigger example of that in action was the Grateful Dead. They

officially allowed bootlegging - IOW, copying of their concerts. They

still sold out concerts, sold recordings, didn't do it with big

commercial "hit" songs. They seemed to be more commercially successful

at it than that well-known English singer/songwriter who blogged about

how every time she performed live, she lost money and was seriously

talking about no longer touring.
An old example of musicians making a living at it were the bards. They

wrote and shared music and news. The more successful they were at

pleasing their audience, the better they were paid. They also shared

songs among themselves, I think because they knew that improving each

bard's ability to survive and prosper made it easier for the whole group

of bards. If your village had a great time when one bard had been there,

you're more likely to think better of the next bard that comes through

town. (And lest you think people back then didn't have the means to

readily copy a bard's song - they did. People back then were much much

better at memorizing and singing than people in our present "passive

consumer" culture.)
Anyway, I support copyright with reasonable limitations. What I think

the recording industries are trying to do under the guise of copyright

protection is force it to become a "pay per play" thing: If you want to

listen to a particular song 20 times, you pay for it 20 times.
--

David

gnome@hawaii.rr.com

authenticity, honesty, community

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user