linuxaudio.org

On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 11:47:21AM +0200, Philipp ??berbacher wrote:

quoted text
> Excerpts from Brent Busby's message of 2010-06-03 12:43:39 +0200:

> > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, david wrote:

> >

> > > I don't know all those details. JackDMP 1.9.x works here where I

> > > couldn't get JACK 0.116 to work. But I've only got lowly single-core

> > > processors here.

> >

> > Hmm...  That's mostly what I was wanting to know.  I've heard the 0.x

> > series is more mature, and I've been using it -- but does that mean the

> > 1.x series is deprecated?  Is it working for most people?

>

> Neither is the successor of the other, neither is deprecated. It's two

> implementations developed in parallel.

Wait, what?
Last I was following this, Paul was saying fairly consistently that jackdmp was intended to replace jackd. Newer codebase, better implementation, C++ not C, multi-core, etc etc.
Has that position changed while I wasn't paying attention?
-ken

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user