Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin@...>

Cc: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-)

Date: Saturday, June 19, 2010 - 10:55 pm

Hi Jack!

   You're welcome. I sometimes wonder: Is it so strange for a musician to know

these facts? Might be, that I'm just used to it, on the other hand it's such a

simple method of learning. Not very self-reliant, but I wouldn't say rare. Or

am I wrong here? I suppose this method is especially appealing to jazz

musicians, as they have to learn, not to play by sheet music, but to

improvise. The most important thing for some kinds of jazz is - as I believe -

grasping the basic theme, taking it up and then working with it. Well, this

type of workflow is not so common among classical musicians, I daresay. Hm...

   Warm regards

          Julien
--------

Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========

http://ltsb.sourceforge.net

the Linux TextBased Studio guide

======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======

http://www.juliencoder.de

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Sat Jun 19, 1:12 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), alexander, (Sun Jun 20, 1:23 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), M Watts, (Sun Jun 20, 11:52 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Mon Jun 21, 10:09 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Niels Mayer, (Mon Jun 21, 2:26 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), M Watts, (Mon Jun 21, 10:15 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Mon Jun 21, 10:19 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Niels Mayer, (Mon Jun 21, 7:05 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Stephen Stubbs, (Tue Jun 22, 12:55 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Joep L. Blom, (Mon Jun 21, 9:42 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Joshua Boyd, (Mon Jun 21, 9:12 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Niels Mayer, (Tue Jun 22, 1:14 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Tue Jun 22, 9:46 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Niels Mayer, (Tue Jun 22, 9:14 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Josh Lawrence, (Fri Jun 25, 2:59 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Tue Jun 22, 9:45 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Niels Mayer, (Wed Jun 23, 1:37 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Niels Mayer, (Thu Jun 24, 7:06 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Wed Jun 23, 3:17 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Mon Jun 21, 8:58 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Sun Jun 20, 3:33 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Josh Lawrence, (Sat Jun 19, 9:27 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), M Watts, (Sun Jun 20, 11:52 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Sat Jun 19, 10:30 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Rustom Mody, (Sun Jun 20, 2:42 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Stephen Stubbs, (Sun Jun 20, 1:15 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Sun Jun 20, 3:31 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), david, (Mon Jun 21, 5:17 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Mon Jun 21, 10:26 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Sun Jun 20, 8:02 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Rustom Mody, (Sun Jun 20, 11:38 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Sun Jun 20, 3:26 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), david, (Mon Jun 21, 5:14 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Joep L. Blom, (Sun Jun 20, 7:59 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), , (Sun Jun 20, 11:10 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Sun Jun 20, 11:27 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Lorenzo, (Mon Jun 21, 7:12 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Mon Jun 21, 10:29 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), , (Mon Jun 21, 12:07 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Mon Jun 21, 10:17 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Rustom Mody, (Mon Jun 21, 4:04 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Sun Jun 20, 8:13 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Jack O'Quin, (Sat Jun 19, 10:50 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Julien Claassen, (Sat Jun 19, 10:55 pm)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), david, (Sun Jun 20, 5:48 am)

Re: [LAU] A Bach in appology and completeness :-), Renato, (Sat Jun 19, 11:50 pm)