Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, June 12, 2010 - 12:12 pm

Am 11.06.2010 15:16, schrieb Joep L. Blom:

Well - I see. I'd never use Audacity for such work so I misunderstood
the task as I recommended MWH.
For such work Ardour is absolutely the best choice:

http://ardour.org

Ardour is made for such kind of recordings and can handle all you
request and much more. It can be installed easily via synaptic.

> , the view of qtractor where all

Ardour has a search-window for Plugins in wich you can enter words like
"limiter" or "reverb" that will find most of the plugins that are
available for the tasks you request. If you like to have nice GUIs too,
try the LV2-versions of the plugins where available.

> But at the moment my

Reading about you setup in the following mails in this thread I suggest:

/usr/bin/jackd -u -dalsa -dhw:0 -r48000 -p512 -n3 -Xseq

this works perfectly well for me with the very same audiochip and a
lesser machine.

Is your system set up for realtime?
Ubuntu uses a file in /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf that holds the
following lines:

@audio - rtprio 99
@audio - memlock unlimited

without this file, your jack wont work as it can. You also have to add
your user to group audio.

> I cannot understand why

This should not be neccessary.
As of now, killing pulseaudio does not work. PA should be suspended
automatically as jackd starts. This works, let us say: okayish for me.

> Thanks in advance,

your welcome :-)

> Joep

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] audacity alternative?, Greg, (Fri Jun 11, 2:59 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, tee, (Sun Jun 13, 2:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas, (Fri Jun 11, 12:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Atte André Jensen, (Fri Jun 11, 9:04 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Lorenzo, (Fri Jun 11, 6:13 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Jeremy, (Fri Jun 11, 8:06 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Joel Roth, (Fri Jun 11, 4:54 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Joep L. Blom, (Fri Jun 11, 6:23 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Hartmut Noack, (Fri Jun 11, 11:55 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Joep L. Blom, (Fri Jun 11, 1:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Hartmut Noack, (Sat Jun 12, 12:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Jeremy Jongepier, (Fri Jun 11, 1:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Joep L. Blom, (Fri Jun 11, 1:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, cal, (Sat Jun 12, 2:19 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, david, (Sat Jun 12, 5:12 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, cal, (Sat Jun 12, 3:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Jeremy Jongepier, (Sat Jun 12, 8:30 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Joep L. Blom, (Sat Jun 12, 2:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, david, (Sat Jun 12, 11:33 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Jeremy Jongepier, (Fri Jun 11, 2:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Andrew C, (Fri Jun 11, 4:26 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, andy baxter, (Sat Jun 12, 2:08 pm)