Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, June 11, 2010 - 1:17 pm

Hartmut Noack wrote:

Hartmut,
You suggested mwaveedit and, as I'm rather new, I loaded it using
synaptic (ubuntu Karmic 9.10) it installed without problems and it
loaded rather fast.
However, my first impression is that for the task I want to perform
mixing 4 tracks recorded from 2 piano's,(2 recorded with 2 microphones
and 2 from the output of an E-piano), the view of qtractor where all
channels can be combined together is easier than 4 separate windows,
although it seems much easier to change the presentation of each
channel individually in mwaveedit.
Primarily I'm musician (former computer-'expert', programming in
various languages) and not at all familiar with the 'language' used in
the digital audio world. So I have to get to know what the LADSPA
filternames mean as the names has no meaning to me. But at the moment my
most pressing problem is the fact that I get lots of XRUN errors which
clip the sound so a notmal mix cannot be made. I cannot understand why
this should happen as I have an AMD Phenom II (4-core) processor so I
assume more than sufficient computing power: I have it as well in
qtractor as in mwaveedit.
If somebody can give some clues what to change I would be very grateful.
I use the plain Karmic kernel with no extra sound modules. Stopping
pulsaudio (pulseaudio -k) doesn't make any difference.
Thanks in advance,
Joep
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] audacity alternative?, Greg, (Fri Jun 11, 2:59 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, tee, (Sun Jun 13, 2:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas, (Fri Jun 11, 12:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Atte André Jensen, (Fri Jun 11, 9:04 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Lorenzo, (Fri Jun 11, 6:13 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Jeremy, (Fri Jun 11, 8:06 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Joel Roth, (Fri Jun 11, 4:54 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Joep L. Blom, (Fri Jun 11, 6:23 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Hartmut Noack, (Fri Jun 11, 11:55 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Joep L. Blom, (Fri Jun 11, 1:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Hartmut Noack, (Sat Jun 12, 12:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Jeremy Jongepier, (Fri Jun 11, 1:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Joep L. Blom, (Fri Jun 11, 1:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, cal, (Sat Jun 12, 2:19 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, david, (Sat Jun 12, 5:12 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, cal, (Sat Jun 12, 3:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Jeremy Jongepier, (Sat Jun 12, 8:30 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Joep L. Blom, (Sat Jun 12, 2:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, david, (Sat Jun 12, 11:33 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Jeremy Jongepier, (Fri Jun 11, 2:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, Andrew C, (Fri Jun 11, 4:26 am)
Re: [LAU] audacity alternative?, andy baxter, (Sat Jun 12, 2:08 pm)