Re: [LAU] memlock lack

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, May 27, 2010 - 8:35 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 27.05.2010 20:19, schrieb Pablo Fernandez:

Is there a special reason to change from the known method to write to
limits.conf to a all-new method to write to a file nobody seems to have
heared of before?

Is there any relese-note or such, where these reasons are discussed?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkv+13sACgkQ1Aecwva1SWOcOACfbmHlTptJbh/54Rr7f1T2HUKJ
qhsAnimNmR74N7ND+ZdbLbvMWZDtmw9E
=mrGR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] memlock lack, J., (Thu May 27, 7:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] memlock lack, Pablo Fernandez, (Thu May 27, 8:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] memlock lack, Hartmut Noack, (Thu May 27, 8:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] memlock lack, Arnold Krille, (Thu May 27, 9:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] memlock lack, Harry Van Haaren, (Thu May 27, 7:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] memlock lack, ailo, (Thu May 27, 7:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] memlock lack, Harry Van Haaren, (Thu May 27, 8:02 pm)