Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <fons@...>, <ken@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, May 24, 2010 - 9:42 pm

--_aacd64ae-fb90-4572-8529-af19885b1d9b_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

somebody wrote:

read that man page again? Or perhaps just those two sentences.

The direct route will be taken unless you are very=2C very serious=2C take =
a good aim=2C
brace yourself=2C and then explicitly shoot yourself in the foot. You can d=
o it=2C but you
probably wouldn't want to do it again.

That course of action was not a part of the thread. Your interpretation of =
the manual
is wrong.

Regards=2C nick.

"we have to make sure the old choice [Windows] doesn't disappear=94.
Jim Wong=2C president of IT products=2C Acer

> Date: Mon=2C 24 May 2010 22:50:08 +0200

Iface
ppp0
eth0
ppp0
ing netmasks=2C a local route doesn't have to be added explicitly. Maybe th=
at's what caused the confusion.
). All packets using this route will
e used for that route depends on how we
be set up before.
=2C
=20
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=3D60969=

--_aacd64ae-fb90-4572-8529-af19885b1d9b_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

somebody wrote:&gt=3B adds a default route (which will be used if =
no other route matches).&gt=3B&gt=3B which seems to imply that the =
existence of an interface does *not* imply&gt=3Bthat packets for the co=
rresponding network are routed to it.Do you want to read that man pag=
e again? Or perhaps just those two sentences.The direct route will =
be taken unless you are very=2C very serious=2C take a good aim=2Cbrace=
yourself=2C and then explicitly shoot yourself in the foot. You can do it=
=2C but youprobably wouldn't want to do it again.That course of=
action was not a part of the thread. Your interpretation of the manual=
is wrong.Regards=2C nick."we have to make sure the old choi=
ce [Windows] doesn't disappear=94.Jim Wong=2C president of IT products=
=2C Acer&gt=3B Date: Mon=2C 24 May 2010 22:50:08 +0200<=
br>&gt=3B From: fons@kokkinizita.net&gt=3B To: ken@restivo.org&gt=
=3B CC: linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org&gt=3B Subject: Re: [LAU] =
Sending audio to another computer&gt=3B &gt=3B On Mon=2C May 24=2C =
2010 at 12:09:33PM -0700=2C Ken Restivo wrote:&gt=3B &gt=3B &gt=3B =
If I bring up a local network=2C say:&gt=3B &gt=3B $ sudo ifconfig eth0=
192.168.42.177 up&gt=3B &gt=3B &gt=3B The route to that 42 networ=
k is added to the routing table:&gt=3B &gt=3B $ route -n&gt=3B &gt=
=3B Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use=
Iface&gt=3B &gt=3B 68.28.49.85 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH =
0 0 0 ppp0&gt=3B &gt=3B 192.168.42.0 0.0.0.0 =
255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0&gt=3B &gt=3B 0.0.0.0 =
68.28.49.85 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0&gt=3B &=
gt=3B &gt=3B &gt=3B Again=2C assuming we're keeping it simple and deali=
ng with non-overlapping netmasks=2C a local route doesn't have to be added =
explicitly. Maybe that's what caused the confusion.&gt=3B &gt=3B &gt=3B What made me write the previous post was this excerpt from the=
&gt=3B route manpage:&gt=3B &gt=3B route add default gw mango-gw&gt=3B adds a default route (which will be used if no other route m=
atches). All packets using this route will&gt=3B be gatewaye=
d through "mango-gw". The device which will actually be used for that route=
depends on how we&gt=3B can reach "mango-gw" - the static route=
to "mango-gw" will have to be set up before.&gt=3B &gt=3B &gt=
=3B which seems to imply that the existence of an interface does *not* impl=
y&gt=3B that packets for the corresponding network are routed to it. No=
r=2C IMHO=2C&gt=3B should it - you still may want to route some destina=
tions on that network&gt=3B via an other way=2C for whatever reason.&gt=3B &gt=3B Ciao=2C&gt=3B &gt=3B -- &gt=3B FA&gt=3B =
&gt=3B O tu=2C che porte=2C correndo si ?&gt=3B E guerra e morte !<=
br>&gt=3B _______________________________________________&gt=3B Linux-a=
udio-user mailing list&gt=3B Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org&=
gt=3B http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user =
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it=
now.

=

--_aacd64ae-fb90-4572-8529-af19885b1d9b_--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Sending audio to another computer, Grant, (Fri May 21, 11:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, Mark Knecht, (Sun May 23, 4:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, Ken Restivo, (Mon May 24, 5:37 am)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, Ng Oon-Ee, (Sat May 22, 1:49 am)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, drew Roberts, (Sat May 22, 3:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, Grant, (Sat May 22, 8:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, drew Roberts, (Mon May 24, 12:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, Ken Restivo, (Mon May 24, 2:40 am)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, drew Roberts, (Mon May 24, 1:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, Hakan Koseoglu, (Mon May 24, 12:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, Ken Restivo, (Mon May 24, 7:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, Nick Copeland, (Mon May 24, 9:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, Paul Davis, (Sat May 22, 9:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, Brett McCoy, (Sat May 22, 9:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sat May 22, 10:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, Brett McCoy, (Sat May 22, 8:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sending audio to another computer, david, (Sat May 22, 9:01 pm)