On Tue, 18 May 2010 22:56:44 +0200
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 02:29:01AM -0700, Ken Restivo wrote:
This is rather disturbing. I had noticed that jamin was quite
processor heavy, but was unaware that this was unnecessary. Has this
been discussed with the devs? Mostly I like the way it sounds and works,
and the interface it presents (not that I have much to compare it
with). I would rather see it improved than dropped.
Will J Godfrey
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
Linux-audio-user mailing list