Re: [LAU] [ANN] Bristol 0.60.0 Command Line Interface

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 - 7:26 pm

--0016e6da7de1a011880484c429fa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Going slightly OT here, but attached is a bank of sounds for the prophet52
emulator that I've created.

I hope you all enjoy them!

Andrew Coughlan

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Nick Copeland w=
rote:

> To get this now you need to select Unison, and start bristol with the

ve
ke
h
re
in
s
ly
ed
e
ht
If
=3D

--0016e6da7de1a011880484c429fa
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Going slightly OT here, but attached is a bank of sounds for the prophet52 =
emulator that I've created.I hope you all enjoy them!An=
drew CoughlanOn Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:4=
9 PM, Nick Copeland <nickycopeland@hotmail.com> wrote:

To get this now you need to select Unison, and start bristol with the param=
etersbelow. In the current release the code does a default invocation o=
f the emulatorparameters which limit the voices to something like the o=
riginal, eg, the mini gets
a single voice (that rolls all the time irrespective of what notes you give=
it) andthe Prophet-5 gets, er, five. It should introduce a little &#39=
;detune' to make the soundmove a bit more but. It is pretty arbitra=
ry detune, it doesn't change with time, only
with key events and I was considering making it a bit more like temperature=
driftover time which at the moment it isn't.startBristol -=
prophet -voices 32When you select the emulator I configure some def=
aults that get reported in the
output. The assigned voices should all get a different amount of detune as =
that ishow it is coded.Andrew reported that this 32 voice uniso=
n, dual oscillator synth, currently uses about 65% CPU on a 2.X GHz pro=
cessor, or about 2% per voice although you
will need a late 0.50 or 0.60 to do that. Previous releases (0.40) required=
a bitmore CPU, about 10% per voice, which means this same attempt woul=
d make Jack very, very unhappy - a realtime thread asking for 320% CPU.=
This was one
of the main reasons bristol was not really considered to be RT safe (there =
wereother reasons too but they should also have been removed in the lat=
er releases).The CPU footprint can be reduced further by selecting =
-lwf, or light weight
filters, they should cut a half off again for a small change in quality. If=
you want to use more CPU you can too, documented in the ChangeLog.=
Regards, Nick."we have to make sure the =
old choice [Windows] doesn't disappear=94.
Jim Wong, president of IT products, Acer> Date=
: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:49:56 +0200> From: julien@c-lab.de> To: countfuzzball@gmail.com

U] [ANN] Bristol 0.60.0 Command Line Interface
to hear them. 64 oscillator unison indeed. :-) > Wow!> Ki=
ndest regards> Julien> > --------> =
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
=3D=3D=3D=3D> http://ltsb.sourceforge.net> the Linux TextBased Studio guid=
e> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D
iencoder.de> _____________________=
__________________________> Linux-audio-user mailing list> Li=
nux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

Hotmail: Powerful Free email wi=
th security by Microsoft. Get it now.

--0016e6da7de1a011880484c429fa--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] [ANN] Bristol 0.60.0 Command Line Interface, Nick Copeland, (Mon Apr 19, 10:55 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] Bristol 0.60.0 Command Line Interface, Julien Claassen, (Wed Apr 21, 9:50 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] Bristol 0.60.0 Command Line Interface, Nick Copeland, (Wed Apr 21, 12:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] Bristol 0.60.0 Command Line Interface, Andrew C, (Wed Apr 21, 7:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] Bristol 0.60.0 Command Line Interface, Julien Claassen, (Wed Apr 21, 7:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] Bristol 0.60.0 Command Line Interface, Gwenhwyfaer, (Mon Apr 19, 11:28 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] Bristol 0.60.0 Command Line Interface, Julien Claassen, (Mon Apr 19, 11:33 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] Bristol 0.60.0 Command Line Interface, rosea.grammostola, (Mon Apr 19, 11:21 am)