Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db

Date: Saturday, April 17, 2010 - 3:05 am

On Tuesday 13 April 2010 15:41:18 Ken Restivo wrote:

quoted text

> It's all ones and zeroes. Given the same inputs, the same output should be
> obtained. Acoustics is physics. And if I can't measure it, it doesn't
> exist.

There's a lot in acoustics that's not yet quite completely understood :)
Especially when it comes to psycho-acoustics, which is what interests us in
the end, when it comes to music production...
amongst other things...

sincerely,
Marije
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Gwenhwyfaer, (Tue Apr 13, 9:21 am)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, , (Tue Apr 13, 10:23 am)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Gwenhwyfaer, (Tue Apr 13, 2:07 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Ken Restivo, (Tue Apr 13, 7:43 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, nescivi, (Sat Apr 17, 3:05 am)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Rick Green, (Wed Apr 14, 4:23 am)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Paul Davis, (Wed Apr 14, 12:57 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Apr 18, 3:22 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Arnold Krille, (Wed Apr 14, 5:53 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Rick Green, (Wed Apr 14, 3:24 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Ken Restivo, (Wed Apr 14, 5:33 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Monty Montgomery, (Wed Apr 14, 3:12 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Paul Davis, (Wed Apr 14, 9:58 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, , (Wed Apr 14, 10:51 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Arnold Krille, (Tue Apr 13, 8:58 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Ken Restivo, (Tue Apr 13, 9:31 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, , (Tue Apr 13, 8:44 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Tue Apr 13, 8:08 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Ken Restivo, (Tue Apr 13, 9:20 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, david, (Wed Apr 14, 6:02 am)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Roger, (Wed Apr 14, 7:49 am)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Atte André Jensen, (Tue Apr 13, 10:49 am)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Folderol, (Tue Apr 13, 5:09 pm)