Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010 - 5:18 pm

--nextPart3222794.qWlFN06dpf
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thursday 15 April 2010 11:22:42 Gwenhwyfaer wrote:

Me? Because I say 99 out of 100 is scientific proof?

If 99 out of 100 is not enough for you, better not take any medicine. Many =
of=20
that is "proven" in studies where 3 out of 10 had an improvement... And yes=
,=20
they had a total test group of ten for that study.

Arnold

--nextPart3222794.qWlFN06dpf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkvHSjsACgkQuYLL1cDjHx1FBwCbBb924yS4M9eJc6DU+loorS8Y
t5MAn01PmvNcCP8cQY2qnykGZmhOOS8d
=ZMVB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart3222794.qWlFN06dpf--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Monty Montgomery, (Thu Apr 15, 6:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Monty Montgomery, (Thu Apr 15, 6:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Arnold Krille, (Thu Apr 15, 5:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Apr 14, 9:06 pm)