Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: <fons@...>
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 - 10:51 pm

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 05:58:10PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:

> the best documented case i'm personally familiar with was an FOH

Given today's disk technology this is not really
a big surprise. One way to increase the speed of
a head positioning servo is to make it open loop
for at least part of its bandwidth, relying on
controlled forces and inertia to control fast
movement rather than on position feedback. Any
such system would be quite sensitive to vibration
in the frequency range not covered by feedback.

Ciao,

--
FA

O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Apr 18, 3:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Monty Montgomery, (Wed Apr 14, 3:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, , (Wed Apr 14, 10:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Tue Apr 13, 8:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Atte André Jensen, (Tue Apr 13, 10:49 am)