Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: Atte André Jensen <atte.jensen@...>

To: <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db

Date: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 - 10:49 am

fons@kokkinizita.net wrote:

> There's one positive side to this whole story and

quoted text

> that is Atte's critical reaction: at least he had
> to courage to question the nonsense, something that
> judging by their replies, can't be said of most
> members of that forum.

:-)

Thanks for all the second opinions, guys! The author of the "in depth"
article has some valid points in general, and I heard some of his
mastering work, which sounds really great.

But for now I'll stop feeling guilty when I see my master fader away
from 0db :-)

--
Atte

http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Gwenhwyfaer, (Tue Apr 13, 9:21 am)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, , (Tue Apr 13, 10:23 am)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Gwenhwyfaer, (Tue Apr 13, 2:07 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Ken Restivo, (Tue Apr 13, 7:43 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, nescivi, (Sat Apr 17, 3:05 am)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Rick Green, (Wed Apr 14, 4:23 am)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Paul Davis, (Wed Apr 14, 12:57 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Apr 18, 3:22 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Arnold Krille, (Wed Apr 14, 5:53 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Rick Green, (Wed Apr 14, 3:24 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Ken Restivo, (Wed Apr 14, 5:33 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Monty Montgomery, (Wed Apr 14, 3:12 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Paul Davis, (Wed Apr 14, 9:58 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, , (Wed Apr 14, 10:51 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Arnold Krille, (Tue Apr 13, 8:58 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Ken Restivo, (Tue Apr 13, 9:31 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, , (Tue Apr 13, 8:44 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Tue Apr 13, 8:08 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Ken Restivo, (Tue Apr 13, 9:20 pm)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, david, (Wed Apr 14, 6:02 am)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Roger, (Wed Apr 14, 7:49 am)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Atte André Jensen, (Tue Apr 13, 10:49 am)

Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db, Folderol, (Tue Apr 13, 5:09 pm)