Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, March 4, 2010 - 8:05 am

>

60k is hardly bloat when you look at the amount of work and
functionality that has been achieved with LADI so far.

Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] bare minimum session handling, Renato, (Tue Mar 2, 10:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, Renato, (Wed Mar 3, 5:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, Paul Davis, (Wed Mar 3, 11:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, torbenh, (Fri Mar 5, 6:39 am)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Mar 3, 6:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, Dieter Plaetinck, (Wed Mar 3, 11:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, Ray Rashif, (Thu Mar 4, 8:02 am)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Mar 4, 8:05 am)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Tue Mar 2, 11:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, michael noble, (Wed Mar 3, 2:14 am)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, fred, (Tue Mar 2, 11:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, david, (Wed Mar 3, 8:59 am)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, micromoog, (Tue Mar 2, 11:46 pm)