Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Renato <rennabh@...>
Cc: <Linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, March 3, 2010 - 11:49 pm

On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Renato wrote:

> It seems that a more definitive solution would need a partial rewriting

you're on the wrong mailing list :)

> OTOH the only active development that is being made to solve this whole

not so. the has been very active discussion and even more active
coding in the jack community, particularly by torben, in the very
recent past (right up until now, in fact).

--p
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] bare minimum session handling, Renato, (Tue Mar 2, 10:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, Renato, (Wed Mar 3, 5:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, Paul Davis, (Wed Mar 3, 11:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, torbenh, (Fri Mar 5, 6:39 am)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Mar 3, 6:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, Dieter Plaetinck, (Wed Mar 3, 11:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, Ray Rashif, (Thu Mar 4, 8:02 am)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Mar 4, 8:05 am)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Tue Mar 2, 11:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, michael noble, (Wed Mar 3, 2:14 am)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, fred, (Tue Mar 2, 11:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, david, (Wed Mar 3, 8:59 am)
Re: [LAU] bare minimum session handling, micromoog, (Tue Mar 2, 11:46 pm)