Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?

Date: Wednesday, March 3, 2010 - 11:08 am

Am Dienstag 02 März 2010 01:48:02 schrieb Edgar Aichinger:

quoted text

> Am Montag 01 März 2010 20:12:58 schrieb Paul Davis:
> > it doesn't. but i have to say that since i first encountered it,
> > thanks to brian eno's noodlings on the cover of, hmm, can't recall,
> > but one of the earliest recordings on EG, i've always been struck at
> > what a big improvement it makes to an otherwise stereo setup.
>
> I think that was "Discreet Music". IIRC he told to wire a third (rear)
> speaker to the two "plus" poles of a stereo amp.

Oh, I just moved furniture and got those old Eno vinyls in my hands, so I
correct myself: it was "Ambient 4: On Land" (EGED 20, 1982).

"Discreet Music" shows the schematics for the setup that later became wider
known as Frippertronics ;)

Edgar
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Martin Leese, (Sun Feb 28, 8:24 pm)

Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Paul Davis, (Mon Mar 1, 7:13 pm)

Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Edgar Aichinger, (Tue Mar 2, 12:48 am)

Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Edgar Aichinger, (Wed Mar 3, 11:08 am)

Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Martin Leese, (Mon Mar 1, 8:29 pm)