Re: [LAU] measuring "average RMS"

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: <fons@...>
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010 - 12:05 am

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:22:17PM +0000, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:

Yes, that could be very useful. And given the histogram
you could program an ad-hoc dynamics processor to tune
a recording into whatever is required.
That's just an example of something more general: non-RT
processing is much more powerfull than RT. That goes for
things like pitch correction as well.

Ciao,

--
FA

O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] measuring "average RMS", Atte André Jensen, (Tue Mar 16, 3:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] measuring "average RMS", becks, (Tue Mar 16, 3:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] measuring "average RMS", Atte André Jensen, (Wed Mar 17, 10:09 am)
Re: [LAU] measuring "average RMS", , (Wed Mar 17, 11:21 am)
Re: [LAU] measuring "average RMS", Atte André Jensen, (Wed Mar 17, 4:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] measuring "average RMS", , (Wed Mar 17, 7:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] measuring "average RMS", Gordon JC Pearce, (Wed Mar 17, 11:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] measuring "average RMS", , (Thu Mar 18, 12:05 am)
Re: [LAU] measuring "average RMS", Atte André Jensen, (Wed Mar 17, 10:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] measuring "average RMS", , (Wed Mar 17, 11:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] measuring "average RMS", Folderol, (Wed Mar 17, 4:31 pm)