Re: [LAU] A sound decision

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - 6:17 pm

--nextPart8305454.X9MtqKa1zq
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Wednesday 17 March 2010 18:47:08 david wrote:

Actually its not "ubuntu" that does the checking but that little gui-tool.=
=20
Which can be un-installed with less then five clicks if needed.
Real automatic updates have to be activated by hand in ubuntu. Probably onl=
y=20
by console-work. Don't know if that is also possible in gui because I only =
use=20
the console tools...

Apart from that I think ubuntu's release mode is much more suited for stayi=
ng=20
stable then gentoo's/arch's as it allows to run "only security fixes"/"only=
=20
minor updates" for 18 months with the regular releases and for five whole y=
ears=20
with the LTS-releases.
Last time I tried something like that with gentoo, I switched to ubuntu aft=
er=20
a day of failures...

Have fun,

Arnold

--nextPart8305454.X9MtqKa1zq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkuhHKAACgkQuYLL1cDjHx2csACfczPOd6fHbjy0QDgN56HIcuj0
X80An0y4h1uezEIPWLVCpeYoTYSKKm6e
=WOR9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart8305454.X9MtqKa1zq--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Stephen Stubbs, (Wed Mar 17, 1:24 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Andras Simon, (Wed Mar 17, 9:20 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, david, (Wed Mar 17, 5:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Leo, (Wed Mar 17, 5:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, david, (Wed Mar 17, 5:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Arnold Krille, (Wed Mar 17, 6:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Ray Rashif, (Wed Mar 17, 9:26 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Andras Simon, (Wed Mar 17, 11:52 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Philipp, (Wed Mar 17, 2:32 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Ray Rashif, (Wed Mar 17, 7:32 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Stephen Stubbs, (Wed Mar 17, 1:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Arnold Krille, (Wed Mar 17, 7:58 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Ray Rashif, (Wed Mar 17, 9:02 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, david, (Wed Mar 17, 5:11 pm)