Re: [LAU] A sound decision

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - 7:58 am

--nextPart1277731.cCahD38ief
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Wednesday 17 March 2010 08:32:15 Ray Rashif wrote:

> ## Conclusion ##

Having worked with gentoo and therefore knowing the update-processes in suc=
h a=20
setup, I can tell you that your calculation is senseless. Its not wrong in =
the=20
mathematical sense, although you can't really add up update-sizes because=20
after some months you will realize that not every in-between version of an =
app=20
to go from the initially installed one to the final one will have to be=20
downloaded and installed.
But its wrong because the time and trouble for updates aren't the download=
=20
times but the times when you configure and reconfigure services. And when y=
ou=20
try to manage to get your current distribution-tool to work with the=20
repository present in ten years. And the time to learn about which apps and=
=20
libs have been deprecated and discontinued and which new apps and libs repl=
ace=20
these...

> I didn't have

Hope you get better soon!

Arnold

--nextPart1277731.cCahD38ief
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkugi5AACgkQuYLL1cDjHx3NrwCfdpxg5YYva1nIPg3DJA3wq0W0
kOEAmwbgNfAQoPDxBEoc3WBF92oNseE0
=Kj7Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1277731.cCahD38ief--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Stephen Stubbs, (Wed Mar 17, 1:24 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Andras Simon, (Wed Mar 17, 9:20 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, david, (Wed Mar 17, 5:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Leo, (Wed Mar 17, 5:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, david, (Wed Mar 17, 5:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Arnold Krille, (Wed Mar 17, 6:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Ray Rashif, (Wed Mar 17, 9:26 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Andras Simon, (Wed Mar 17, 11:52 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Philipp, (Wed Mar 17, 2:32 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Ray Rashif, (Wed Mar 17, 7:32 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Stephen Stubbs, (Wed Mar 17, 1:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Arnold Krille, (Wed Mar 17, 7:58 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, Ray Rashif, (Wed Mar 17, 9:02 am)
Re: [LAU] A sound decision, david, (Wed Mar 17, 5:11 pm)