Re: [LAU] denormals, cpu flags, and "minor" apps over-reaching

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 - 4:52 pm

--nextPart1318801.lXxnm0Li55
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday 16 March 2010 14:38:08 Paul Davis wrote:

M

Additionally I think this should be the task of the host, not the plugin if=
=20
CPU-flags are concerned. There might be reasons why the host has already=20
circumvented the denormals by other ways.

Arnold

--nextPart1318801.lXxnm0Li55
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkuft0cACgkQuYLL1cDjHx2MKACeLH0yF/9tsxpJVNkftYYOYV/u
fugAnA0fPrdOwUu7RQMLBa7v/zeTiXfa
=TmW0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1318801.lXxnm0Li55--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] denormals, cpu flags, and "minor" apps over-reaching, Arnold Krille, (Tue Mar 16, 4:52 pm)