Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Martin Leese <martin.leese@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, March 1, 2010 - 7:13 pm

On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Martin Leese
wrote:

it doesn't. but i have to say that since i first encountered it,
thanks to brian eno's noodlings on the cover of, hmm, can't recall,
but one of the earliest recordings on EG, i've always been struck at
what a big improvement it makes to an otherwise stereo setup.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Martin Leese, (Sun Feb 28, 8:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Paul Davis, (Mon Mar 1, 7:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Edgar Aichinger, (Tue Mar 2, 12:48 am)
Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Edgar Aichinger, (Wed Mar 3, 11:08 am)
Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Martin Leese, (Mon Mar 1, 8:29 pm)