Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, February 28, 2010 - 8:24 pm

J?rn Nettingsmeier
...

This is just the old Hafler circuit. It doesn't
really compare with Ambisonics.

Gerzon's contribution to the Hafler circuit was
the addition of a blend or rear spread control
between the rear speakers and ground. This
is described in his later article "A year of
surround-sound", also available at The Gerzon
Archive:
http://www.audiosignal.co.uk/Gerzon%20archive.html

The Hafler circuit is also available at:
http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/Audio/

Regards,
Martin
--
Martin J Leese
E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org
Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Martin Leese, (Sun Feb 28, 8:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Paul Davis, (Mon Mar 1, 7:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Edgar Aichinger, (Tue Mar 2, 12:48 am)
Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Edgar Aichinger, (Wed Mar 3, 11:08 am)
Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Martin Leese, (Mon Mar 1, 8:29 pm)