Re: [LAU] 5.1 to ambisonices (was: more than 4 channels for listening? Really?)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, February 28, 2010 - 8:04 pm

On 02/28/2010 08:54 PM, Martin Leese wrote:

why not just pan the 5 signals on an ambi rig?

if you want to get rid of the hole in the panning (to the rear), you are
prepared to cheat anyways. in that case, it might be interesting to try
a sixth source in the rear, derived from summing SL and SR, maybe
including a few allpass filters for decorrelation...

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] 5.1 to ambisonices (was: more than 4 channels for ..., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 28, 8:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] , Arnold Krille, (Mon Mar 1, 8:46 am)
Re: [LAU] 5.1 to ambisonices (was: more than 4 channels for ..., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Mon Mar 1, 9:50 am)