Re: [LAU] 5.1 to ambisonices (was: more than 4 channels for listening? Really?)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] 5.1 to ambisonices (was: more than 4 channels for listening? Really?)

Date: Sunday, February 28, 2010 - 7:54 pm

Arnold Krille wrote:
...

quoted text

> My rational is that most (all?) 5.1 mixes are: music and action stuff on L+R
> (front), dialogues on C, ambient and action effects on L+R(rear).
> So my idea is to split the rear channels into six or more channels distributed
> around the rear side of the circle (or even sphere) to have a more surrounding
> feeling and overcome the hole in the panning.

Multiple surround speakers fed with the same
signal is what you hear in a cinema.
Recreating that would therefore seem to be a
useful path to go down.

Regards,
Martin
--
Martin J Leese
E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org
Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

Re: [LAU] 5.1 to ambisonices (was: more than 4 channels for ..., Martin Leese, (Sun Feb 28, 7:54 pm)

Re: [LAU] 5.1 to ambisonices (was: more than 4 channels for ..., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 28, 8:04 pm)

Re: [LAU] , Arnold Krille, (Mon Mar 1, 8:46 am)

Re: [LAU] 5.1 to ambisonices (was: more than 4 channels for ..., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Mon Mar 1, 9:50 am)