Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, February 28, 2010 - 7:38 pm

"Bearcat M. Sandor" wrote:

> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 08:42 -0700, Martin Leese wrote:

If your mic was a stereo mic then nothing can
recreate the original sound. There is not
enough information.

> Does ambisonics cancel cross talk as well (like ambiophonics does)?

Ambisonics and Ambiophonics couldn't be
more different. As Fons suggested, a toaster
versus a lawn mower; which is better depends
on whether you want to toast bread or to cut
grass.

> I'm assuming also that Super Stereo is not anything like the crappy DSP

Super Stereo adds nothing to the stereo
source.

I must suggest that it is about time you started
reading the numerous references people have
given you. Nobody can do this for you.

Regards,
Martin
--
Martin J Leese
E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org
Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Martin Leese, (Sun Feb 28, 7:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Sun Feb 28, 9:59 pm)