Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?

Date: Friday, February 26, 2010 - 10:06 am

Arnold,
> I am thinking about adding a 5.1-to-ambisonics mixer/panner to move the

quoted text> specialized channels with their defined positions to virtual sources in my

> ambisonics surrounding. Don't know if that works out...
5.1 is not about proper physical modelling of sound sources, but more

about producing a 'sound experience'. This can mean, for example, that

the audio engineer creates a 2.0 mix and puts some ambience on the rear

channels. It will be a completely different beast and in my experience

it sounds worse than a pure 5.1 playback.
If you find 5.1 material that works out ok, please let me know. I'm

always interested in good references.
Flo

--

Machines can do the work, so people have time to think.

public key DA43FEF4          x-hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Thu Feb 25, 6:27 pm)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, , (Thu Feb 25, 9:14 pm)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Ken Restivo, (Fri Feb 26, 4:21 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 28, 11:19 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Ray Rashif, (Thu Feb 25, 9:22 pm)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Arnold Krille, (Thu Feb 25, 8:41 pm)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Thu Feb 25, 9:21 pm)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Arnold Krille, (Thu Feb 25, 10:01 pm)

[LAU] ambisonics and number of speakers, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 28, 11:04 am)

Re: [LAU] ambisonics and number of speakers, , (Sun Feb 28, 1:00 pm)

Re: [LAU] ambisonics and number of speakers, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 28, 1:21 pm)

Re: [LAU] ambisonics and number of speakers, , (Sun Feb 28, 2:05 pm)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Fri Feb 26, 12:41 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 28, 11:13 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Sun Feb 28, 9:54 pm)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Arnold Krille, (Fri Feb 26, 9:47 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Florian Faber, (Fri Feb 26, 10:06 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, , (Fri Feb 26, 10:31 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 28, 11:09 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Mon Mar 1, 1:39 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Mon Mar 1, 1:50 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Mon Mar 1, 4:08 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Mon Mar 1, 8:54 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Mon Mar 1, 7:42 pm)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Monty Montgomery, (Fri Feb 26, 10:41 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, , (Fri Feb 26, 11:01 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Monty Montgomery, (Thu Feb 25, 10:53 pm)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Paul Davis, (Fri Feb 26, 4:28 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Ken Restivo, (Fri Feb 26, 9:47 pm)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, , (Thu Feb 25, 11:13 pm)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Thu Feb 25, 8:24 pm)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Thu Feb 25, 9:24 pm)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 28, 10:52 am)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Sun Feb 28, 9:15 pm)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Florian Faber, (Thu Feb 25, 6:32 pm)

Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Arnold Krille, (Thu Feb 25, 8:35 pm)

Re: [LAU] Quipping at people's equipment choices (was more t..., Bearcat M. Sandor, (Thu Feb 25, 9:04 pm)

Re: [LAU] Quipping at people's equipment choices (was more t..., david, (Fri Feb 26, 5:46 am)

Re: [LAU] Quipping at people's equipment choices (was more t..., Gwenhwyfaer, (Sun Feb 28, 5:06 am)

Re: [LAU] Quipping at people's equipment choices (was more t..., Gordon JC Pearce, (Sun Feb 28, 10:23 am)

Re: [LAU] Quipping at people's equipment choices (was more t..., Joel Roth, (Sun Feb 28, 8:15 am)

Re: [LAU] Quipping at people's equipment choices (was more t..., , (Thu Feb 25, 9:16 pm)

Re: [LAU] Quipping at people's equipment choices (was more t..., Bearcat M. Sandor, (Thu Feb 25, 9:20 pm)

Re: [LAU] Quipping at people's equipment choices (was more t..., david, (Fri Feb 26, 5:47 am)

Re: [LAU] Quipping at people's equipment choices (was more t..., Bearcat M. Sandor, (Fri Feb 26, 5:53 am)

Re: [LAU] Quipping at people's equipment choices (was more t..., david, (Sun Feb 28, 1:15 am)