Re: [LAU] Quipping at people's equipment choices (was more than 4 channels for listening? Really?)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, February 25, 2010 - 9:04 pm

Arnold Krille wrote:

I know people love to bash people who enjoy audio play-back equipment as
though we all loved the stones that are advertised as making CD players
better or we all think that applying green marker to CDs make a
difference. Not all of us believe that sort of thing. On the other hand,
if you are bashing my choice of speaker because you really think that
all speakers sound the same, i'd love to hear someone back up that
claim. I'm not talking "better" (that's subjective). I don't recall
typing that spikes me a difference in sound (they are devices for
stability) or that cosmetics do either.

Why do people feel the need to snark at people's choice of speakers etc,
especially in a derailing manner to the discussion at hand? If you don't
happen to like my choice of speaker please don't bring up spikes or
something silly like that.

I brought up the subject of the speakers that i use, because it matters
to the subject at hand. The tweeters are unusual and have a different
dispersion pattern than most and that effects the way channel
balance/seated positioning works.

It's kinda like if someone were looking for help editing config files
for alsa on the command line and you think they're use of kde is silly.
At least respond to the questions i posed or put your responses in
another thread. If not, stifle it as it's irrelevant.

Please don't inspire me to throw a shakti stone at you. :"P

Thanks,

Bearcat M. Sandor
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Thu Feb 25, 6:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Ken Restivo, (Fri Feb 26, 4:21 am)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 28, 11:19 am)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Arnold Krille, (Thu Feb 25, 8:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Thu Feb 25, 9:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Arnold Krille, (Thu Feb 25, 10:01 pm)
[LAU] ambisonics and number of speakers, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 28, 11:04 am)
Re: [LAU] ambisonics and number of speakers, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 28, 1:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Fri Feb 26, 12:41 am)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 28, 11:13 am)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Sun Feb 28, 9:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Arnold Krille, (Fri Feb 26, 9:47 am)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Florian Faber, (Fri Feb 26, 10:06 am)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 28, 11:09 am)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Mon Mar 1, 1:39 am)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Mon Mar 1, 1:50 am)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Mon Mar 1, 4:08 am)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Mon Mar 1, 8:54 am)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Mon Mar 1, 7:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Monty Montgomery, (Fri Feb 26, 10:41 am)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Monty Montgomery, (Thu Feb 25, 10:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Ken Restivo, (Fri Feb 26, 9:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Thu Feb 25, 8:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Thu Feb 25, 9:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 28, 10:52 am)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Sun Feb 28, 9:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Florian Faber, (Thu Feb 25, 6:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?, Arnold Krille, (Thu Feb 25, 8:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] Quipping at people's equipment choices (was more t..., Bearcat M. Sandor, (Thu Feb 25, 9:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] Quipping at people's equipment choices (was more t..., Gordon JC Pearce, (Sun Feb 28, 10:23 am)
Re: [LAU] Quipping at people's equipment choices (was more t..., Bearcat M. Sandor, (Thu Feb 25, 9:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] Quipping at people's equipment choices (was more t..., Bearcat M. Sandor, (Fri Feb 26, 5:53 am)