[LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ivica Ico Bukvic <ico@...>, Michael Ost <most@...>, Chris Halaby <chris@...>
Cc: Linux Audio User <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2010 - 12:29 pm

On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:31:33 -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:

an

Hello all,

Given the nature of this discussion, I am CCing the linux-audio-user
mailing list since this is about deleting legitimate content from the
archives because of a company that produces some of those shitty software
locks. I'm not gonna go easy on this.

First of all, let me remind you, and every linux-audio-user member out
there that the archives *ARE PUBLIC*, and thus what you post here will be
eventually readable by the *WHOLE WORLD*.

Read this again: the archives *ARE PUBLIC*, and thus what you post here
will be eventually readable by the *WHOLE WORLD*
Once more just to make sure: the archives *ARE PUBLIC*, and thus what you
post here will be eventually readable by the *WHOLE WORLD*

Deleting the post is not going to happen, I am only willing to censor the
one post that poses an issue provided the name of the company is mentioned
on a censor banner inside the post. The least we can do with such a case is
add a little public humiliation to this.

Also I would like to say that this is the one and only time that this
happens. Next time, the original poster will face the legal consequences. I
hope this is crystal clear to every one reading.

Just to make sure we are talking about the right post, is it this one ?
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2007-January/0417...

I will not even read a reply that does not include the linux-audio-user
list in CC.

Cheers,
--
Marc-Olivier Barre
XMPP ID : marco@marcochapeau.org
www.MarcOChapeau.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post), Marc-Olivier Barre, (Tue Feb 2, 12:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post), Josh Lawrence, (Tue Feb 2, 6:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post), Andreas Kuckartz, (Tue Feb 2, 8:33 pm)
[LAU] , Marc-Olivier Barre, (Tue Feb 2, 9:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] Solved ? CENSORING public archives, Josh Lawrence, (Tue Feb 2, 10:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] Solved ? CENSORING public archives, Jack O'Quin, (Tue Feb 2, 10:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] Solved ? CENSORING public archives, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Feb 2, 10:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post), Arnold Krille, (Tue Feb 2, 5:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post), Mike Mazarick, (Tue Feb 2, 2:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post), Arnold Krille, (Tue Feb 2, 1:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post), Marc-Olivier Barre, (Tue Feb 2, 1:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post), Julien Claassen, (Tue Feb 2, 11:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post), Hartmut Noack, (Wed Feb 3, 10:33 am)
[LAU] Forum-like user edition of posts (Was: CENSORING publi..., Marc-Olivier Barre, (Tue Feb 2, 11:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post), Luke Peterson, (Tue Feb 2, 12:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post), Marc-Olivier Barre, (Tue Feb 2, 1:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post), Monty Montgomery, (Tue Feb 2, 1:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post), Monty Montgomery, (Tue Feb 2, 1:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post), Nedko Arnaudov, (Tue Feb 2, 1:17 pm)