Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Am Tue, 09. Nov 2010 um 11:57:29 +0100 schrieb torbenh:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 12:49:46PM +1100, Leigh Dyer wrote:
> > Awesome!
> i dont see the transport synchronisation working with a jack1 svn version.
your posting is confusing. Most probably Leigh is not acountable for
your complains and I am not sure they are addressed to me, but I will
give a comment anyway.
First _I_ will surely not use "sync callback", in best case seq24 will.
> and you are relying on the transport to go through the
Second _I_ do not rely on transport via software.
> this issue should be fixed.
Pardon, who is "we"? I can not recall such kind of agreement and I
certainly do not know anything about changes going on in jack svn.
I was not aware of this patch, searching the devel mailing list history
today I found your patch dating from March when I was busy doing other
things. I recommend to verify a little bit earlyer wheather your
contributions get in or not and to attrack attention about important
PS: Please do _not_ CC me for "list replys", this is annoying
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----