Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <fons@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, November 18, 2010 - 8:46 pm

On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:37:30 +0100
fons@kokkinizita.net wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:29:02AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:

I don't understand how the second question could even posed in relation
to the first.

If there is no difference, there can be no preference, unless, of
course, they had other factors to consider besides music.

David
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Thomas Hedegaard, (Thu Nov 18, 11:04 am)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Paul Davis, (Thu Nov 18, 11:29 am)
Re: [LAU] Sampling rate and perceived audio quality [WAS]: R..., Carlos sanchiavedraz, (Wed Dec 8, 6:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sampling rate and perceived audio quality [WAS]: R..., Philipp √úberbacher, (Fri Nov 19, 3:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Ricardus Vincente, (Thu Nov 18, 9:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Arnold Krille, (Thu Nov 18, 10:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, David Santamauro, (Thu Nov 18, 8:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Joe Hartley, (Thu Nov 18, 8:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Florian Faber, (Fri Nov 19, 6:40 am)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Florian Faber, (Thu Nov 18, 11:08 am)