Re: [LAU] [Jack-Devel] zombification behaviour...

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: torbenh <torbenh@...>
Cc: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, November 18, 2010 - 7:50 pm

Torben, a few questions.

1. Is the uncertainty over knowing which client is the offender a
result of the client's jack code being less than optimal? (no offence
to coders)

2.) Can jack, if advisable, take a bit of extra code to more clearly
define which client is the offender?

3.) Would a more robust client ID system solve the challenge of jack
knowing 100% which client is the offender? i.e. Ardour is 001,
jconvolver is 002, etc...... (I imply with this a central list at
jackaudio. org, where jack capable clients are listed, and any coder
that builds a jack app "officially" registers their app, and gets an
app specific ID.)

These questions are based on jack1, which i use.

Alex.

--
www.openoctave.org

midi-subscribe@openoctave.org
development-subscribe@openoctave.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] [Jack-Devel] zombification behaviour..., Robert Jonsson, (Thu Nov 18, 10:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Jack-Devel] zombification behaviour..., torbenh, (Fri Nov 19, 12:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Jack-Devel] zombification behaviour..., Robert Jonsson, (Tue Nov 23, 8:21 am)
Re: [LAU] [Jack-Devel] zombification behaviour..., alex stone, (Thu Nov 18, 7:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Jack-Devel] zombification behaviour..., Ken Restivo, (Fri Nov 19, 10:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Jack-Devel] zombification behaviour..., Gwenhwyfaer, (Sat Nov 20, 12:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Jack-Devel] zombification behaviour..., Paul Davis, (Thu Nov 18, 8:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Jack-Devel] zombification behaviour..., Paul Davis, (Thu Nov 18, 8:04 pm)