Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Eric Steinberg <eric.steinberg@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, November 18, 2010 - 10:38 am

--000e0ce0d6841c75c404955165a2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I use 88.2k because its far better than 44.1k and the files not get as big
as 96k.

Im not very into this stuff, but you can certainly hear the difference. If
you eq in 44.1k you get that early nineties techno high end. Nice for some
things but very bad for accoustic instruments.

A guy tried to explain me once that when you eq digitally it distorts well
under half the samplerate and under 22k is audible. Dont know if its true
but never the less you can hear a big difference...

Off course I end up in 44.1k 16 bit for CD, but that doesnt mean I have to
edit in 44.1

Thomas

2010/11/17 Eric Steinberg

> Hi Thomas, why do you use 88.2k as your samplerate? Just curious; I use

--000e0ce0d6841c75c404955165a2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I use 88.2k because its far better than 44.1k and the files not get as big =
as 96k. Im not very into this stuff, but you can certainly hear the=
difference. If you eq in 44.1k you get that early nineties techno high end=
. Nice for some things but very bad for accoustic instruments.
A guy tried to explain me once that when you eq digitally it distorts w=
ell under half the samplerate and under 22k is audible. Dont know if its tr=
ue but never the less you can hear a big difference...Off course I =
end up in 44.1k 16 bit for CD, but that doesnt mean I have to edit in 44.1<=
br>
Thomas2010/11/17 Eric St=
einberg <e=
ric.steinberg@gmail.com
>
Hi Thomas, why do you use 88.2k as your samplerate? =A0Just curious; I use =
44.1 if I'm going to CD, 48 if I'm doing pro video, and 96 or 192 i=
f I want really high fidelity- but I've never used 88.2.

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Thomas Hedegaard <thomas@vector.dk&gt=
; wrote:

I have a fa-101. To change the samplerate yo=
u have to turn the knob choosing samplerate, then turn off the card on the =
back side wait a little while and turn it on again. Then change the sampler=
ate in settings in jack and then start jack.

Hope it helps..I record in 88.2Khz on Ubuntu 10.04 via Jack=
, works very wellKind Regards Thomas Hedegaard<=
div class=3D"gmail_quote">2010/11/16 Lorenzo Sutton <<=
a href=3D"mailto:lsutton@libero.it" target=3D"_blank">lsutton@libero.it=

Hi try:

- stopping jack
- unplug the card
- change the sample rate knob
- replug the card
- change the sample rate in jack settings (or in jackd command line)
- start jack

Does it work?

Lorenzo

Dragan Noveski wrote:

hallo list,
i borrowed yesterday an edirol fa-101 in order to try if it will work on my=
sidux/aptosid mix.
after some tweaking around and reading errors in qjack's messages windo=
w i get it to work really nicely in 48kHz mode. with all other sample rates=
which the card seems to be providing ( and is providing on my friends mac.=
..) i could not get it to run.

on a ffado page the card is listed as 'full supported', so i unders=
tood that also different SR should work. i also realized that turning the S=
R knob on the card does not changes nothing and that the SR is given in jac=
kd's command line.

could someone who is using this card please make some comments on this?

cheers,
doc
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
=
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
=
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
=
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

--000e0ce0d6841c75c404955165a2--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Thomas Hedegaard, (Wed Nov 17, 6:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Eric Steinberg, (Wed Nov 17, 8:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Thomas Hedegaard, (Thu Nov 18, 10:38 am)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Paul Davis, (Wed Nov 17, 8:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Nov 18, 12:56 am)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Paul Davis, (Thu Nov 18, 2:21 am)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Eric Steinberg, (Wed Nov 17, 8:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Nov 18, 12:55 am)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Paul Davis, (Wed Nov 17, 9:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Robin Gareus, (Wed Nov 17, 9:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?, Dragan Noveski, (Wed Nov 17, 8:34 pm)