Re: [LAU] Plugin confused

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Paul Davis <paul@...>, <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, November 15, 2010 - 10:24 pm

On 15 November 2010 15:11, Paul Davis wrote:
...

I followed you up to this paragraph. LADSPA started it, DSSI improved
on it, and LV2 tried to be the end-all-be-all (the final solution) if
I'm understanding correctly. Oh, and VAMP is sort of a side-show
freak. But can you explain what you mean here, "assuming that both
parties can agree on it"?

--
Christopher "Chip" Van Dan
http://www.van-dan.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Plugin confused, Chip VanDan, (Mon Nov 15, 9:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] Plugin confused, David Adler, (Tue Nov 16, 4:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] Plugin confused, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Mon Nov 15, 10:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Plugin confused, Andrew C, (Mon Nov 15, 10:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] Plugin confused, Julien Claassen, (Mon Nov 15, 9:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Plugin confused, Paul Davis, (Mon Nov 15, 10:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Plugin confused, Chris Cannam, (Tue Nov 16, 9:40 am)
Re: [LAU] Plugin confused, Georg Holzmann, (Tue Nov 16, 6:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] Plugin confused, Chip VanDan, (Mon Nov 15, 10:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] Plugin confused, Fritz Meissner, (Mon Nov 15, 10:33 pm)